Skip links

Justification of Connivance Practices

General Overview

The measure of justification of connivance practices was employed in Sicily, Italy (Mirisola, Travaglino, and Giummusso, 2024). Subsequently, it was translated into English.

The measure is composed of eight items. For each item, participants read a brief scenario portraying a situation of connivance with organized crime. The scale provides participants with a range of context-specific practices and situations around three broad facets: refusals to talk about the mafia, turning a blind eye towards other people’s crimes, and complicity with the mafia. Items were generated with the help of four research assistants familiar with the local contexts.

The items never explicitly mention the mafia or organized crime but refer to events commonly occurring in areas characterized by the strong presence of organized crime.  

The items can be adapted to other contexts in Sicily by altering the names of the neighborhood/local mafia bosses. The tables below show the items adapted to the contexts of Palermo and Catania.

Although some items refer to actual events, they describe generic practices and situations. After reading the scenarios, participants are asked how much they would justify the person’s behavior using a scale ranging from -3 = completely unjustifiable to +3 = completely justifiable.

Justification of Connivance Practices*

  * Note: Variations for the adaption to Catania are indicated in square brackets.

Bibliografy

Mirisola A., Travaglino G. A., & Giammusso, I. (2024) National identification weakens, and territorial identification strengthens, the relationship between masculine honor values and the justification of connivance practices with the mafia. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.13049
This website uses cookies to improve your web experience.